US President Donald Trump, speaking at the NATO Summit on Wednesday, drew sharp global attention with a contentious remark comparing recent US military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II in 1945. “That hit ended the war,” Trump said, drawing a rather controversial parallel between the two events.

美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周三在北约峰会上发表讲话时，因其有争议的言论引发全球高度关注。他将美国近期对伊朗核设施的军事打击与1945年二战期间美国对广岛和长崎投掷原子弹的行动相提并论。“那次打击终结了战争，”特朗普说道，为这两起事件画上了一个颇具争议的等号。

"I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war. This ended the war," Trump said. Trump argued that Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades, because I don't think they'll ever do it again" and he turned to top advisers to reinforce that message. He maintained that his surprise strikes on Tehran forced Iran and Israel into entering a ceasefire agreement after 12 days of war.

“我不想拿广岛举例，也不想拿长崎举例，但本质上那是一样的。那结束了那场战争。这次（打击伊朗）也结束了战争，”特朗普说道。他声称，伊朗的核计划因此“基本上倒退了数十年，因为我觉得他们再也不敢这么做了”，他还寻求顶级顾问来强化这一信息。他坚持认为，自己对德黑兰的突袭迫使伊朗和以色列在持续12天的战争后达成了停火协议。



“Had we not succeeded with that hit, that hit ended the war,” Trump said of his decision to drop on three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. Broadly, he has argued that the strikes were much more successful than has so far been reported in the U.S. media.

“虽然我们那次打击没有成功，但那次打击确实结束了战争，”特朗普在谈到他周末对伊朗三个核设施发动袭击的决定时说道。总体而言，他认为这些打击行动远比美国媒体迄今报道的要成功得多。

Critics have warned that equating precision military strikes with the nuclear devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is both misleading and potentially inflammatory. “There’s no comparing conventional military strikes, however forceful, with the catastrophic and indiscriminate destruction of atomic bombs,” said Laura Jenkins, a historian at the University of Chicago. “The Trump Hiroshima analogy not only distorts history, it risks trivialising the legacy of nuclear warfare.”

批评人士警告称，将精确军事打击与广岛和长崎的核灾难相提并论既具有误导性，又可能引发激化矛盾。“常规军事打击，无论多么有力，都无法与原子弹造成的灾难性和无差别破坏相提并论，”芝加哥大学历史学家劳拉·詹金斯说道。“特朗普用广岛事件作类比，不仅歪曲了历史，还可能淡化核战争的遗留问题。”