|
|
1) Is it necessary to score the schools? they shouldn't score schools, it will make one school more crowded than the other one in result. 2) If you are the evaluator, what do you think it is important for a school? Does this school produce people who has mind to think is importantin my opionion. 3) Why wereour schools out of the top10? our schools relied on text book too much, we should make our students think more other than just remember more text book contain. |
| 参与人数 1 | 鲜花 +20 | 收起 理由 |
|---|---|---|
|
| + 20 | 赠送红包 |
![]() i am laughing ,can't say anything. |
|
answer the question 1)score, schools for students to grasp how much of knowledge, to be a test, nothing more. 2)it is important for school: Teaching students set up correctly on life, worldview, values, thereby recognized yourself, learn to accept yourself, recognized its social value. 3)Quality education in a big banner, ways and means to do to change. Experience Western teaching methods, but each era, ideological ways and ideas are different, is to listen to their ideas, and teaching methods in combination. |
| 参与人数 1 | 鲜花 +20 | 收起 理由 |
|---|---|---|
|
| + 20 | 赠送红包 |
These questions are difficult for me.![]() |
|
1)It's is necessary to score the school. 2)I think the best important is composition and academic atmosphere. 3)In my oppinion, we could viewed the matter from the following two aspects. On the one hand, different standards can product diffierent reasult, although our school will not in thetop 10, we don'tget discouraged.On the other hand, we should realized gap between our school andother school. Ranking reaslut is not best significant, it is important that we have experience from the ranking. |
| 参与人数 1 | 鲜花 +20 | 收起 理由 |
|---|---|---|
|
| + 20 | 赠送红包 |
|
whether necessary to score the schools or not is not a question.As a great many similar ranking performances held by some organizations recently,every relative standard illustrates in respective ones.If be involvedin this kind of ---school rankings,and if I were fortunate enough to be the evaluator,I would list the essence of the school likethese:professional quality,study atmosphere ,environment and style,teacher resources(and also their average age) should be into considered,students comprehensive ability... ... etc. It is not surprisingly that our schools were out of the top ,for it sufficiently proved that most our schools lack of something I mentioned above.The most graduates cultivated by unniversities have largely been a group ofhigh-score but low-capacity.And not exaggerated speaking ,ithas undoubtlybeen a totally education tragedy in mainland.We have payed a high price for this sort of educational scheme. In a word,it is a question of our educational condition, domestic environment and our country system. |
| 参与人数 1 | 鲜花 +20 | 收起 理由 |
|---|---|---|
|
| + 20 | 赠送红包 |
|
it is necessary to score the school.the list of Asia’s top 200 universities was published last month by Quacquarelli Symonds.the ranking performances reflect good methods.In some instances, could explain the nature, quality, strengths and weaknesses. Also contributed to the development of education, confirmed the school's teachers and norms. if i were fortunate to be the evaluator,i realize that the school important methods from teacher strengths. the schools have fared poorly in regional or global rankings. In the absence of a good way to before, with the practice to try out the real path. |
就业率 以及收入 虽然很俗 但是是事实![]() |
/1