开启辅助访问
浅色 暗色
随便看看

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问移动社区

搜索
英语家园 门户 BBC英语 查看主题

BBC·6分钟英语 | Soldier teachers 退伍军人教师

发布者: maitian | 发布时间: 2026-2-11 12:18| 查看数: 134| 评论数: 0|帖子模式



BBC 6 Minute English 是 BBC Learning English 出品的英语学习节目。每周一期,每期约6分钟,两位主播围绕某个话题展开对话,非常适合英音爱好者模仿学习。来源:BBC,仅用于语言学习分享


(点击右边三个点,可调整速度,电脑上可下载)

Rob: Hello, I'm Rob…

Cath: And I'm Cath.

Rob: And this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. Today we're talking about teachers and how one school is planning to only use people who were in the armed forces to work there.

Cath: The Armed Forces. We mean the army, the navy and the air force.

Rob: Yes, that's right. It's thought that former soldiers could make excellent teachers.

Well let's see how much you learnt at school because I've got today's question for you.

Cath: OK.

Rob: According to Government figures, approximately how many school pupils are there in England? Is it:

6.1 million

7.1 million, or

8.1 million

Cath: I have no idea but I am going to go for the one in the middle, 7.1 million.

Rob: OK, well, we'll see if you're right at the end of the programme. Now let's talk more about this idea to use only former soldiers as teachers at a free school in Manchester.

Cath: A free school. Free schools are part of the British government's reforms in education. They allow local parents, teachers or charities to establish – or set up - their own schools.

Rob: And The Phoenix Free School wants to use former soldiers as teachers because they have a lot of life experience. Literally, they have experienced life.

Cath: That's true but does that mean they'll make ideal teachers?

Rob: This is the concern. They will not be qualified teachers.

Cath: So by not being qualified it means they will not have trained to be teachers.

Rob: Yes. But let's hear from Tom Burkard who is on the committee for the new school. He thinks that's not an issue. Listen out for another word he uses that means qualified:

Tom Burkard, member of the committee for the Phoenix Free School The reason for this is simply based on three major American studies that have been done in the last few years. They found that teachers who have little or no training perform just as well as those who are fully certified. The test results of their pupils – there is no statistically significant differences.

Rob: So Tom Burkard is not concerned that these teachers are not fully certified – or qualified. He says 3 different American studies show unqualified teachers perform just as well.

Cath: And their performance – or their good work – is proved by the fact that there is statistically no difference in the test results of the pupils.

Rob: Statistically means the numbers or figures – the numbers or figures show there is no difference.

Cath: So does this imply that maybe teachers don't need training?

Rob: Well as a trained teacher myself, I think you do need to learn how to teach.

And I'm not the only one. There are other critics of the idea.

Cath: So a critic, here, is somebody who is against the idea.

Rob: Mary Bousted is a critic. She's from the Association of Teachers and Lecturers.

She thinks teacher training is necessary. What does she think teachers need to learn?

Mary Bousted, Assosiation of Teachers and Lecturers

The idea that you can simply take the skills and abilities you've learnt in war or on the parade ground or through army manoeuvres, and those can be translated undigested into teaching without any further training is ridiculous. You need to learn about different approaches to teaching and learning and need to learn the research theories about new approaches particularly international approaches.

Cath: So Mary Bousted says the skills and abilities learnt in war can't be translated undigested into teaching. Rob, what does she mean by undigested?

Rob: She's talking about transferring skills to the classroom without any thought or without adapting them for children. She thinks the idea is ridiculous!

Cath: Ridiculous! That's a good word. It means silly or absurd. Mary Bousted thinks teachers need to learn about different approaches to teaching and learning.

Rob: So she doesn't want these soldiers skipping teacher training courses.

Cath: Skipping means missing or avoiding. But Rob, isn't this school breaking the law?

Rob: No it's not. According to Tom Burkard, this plan is legal. Here he is again using the phrase 'free to'. What are they free to do?

Tom Burkard, member of the committee for the Phoenix Free School All free schools are free to employ people who don't have teaching qualifications. The only teacher you have to have who is qualified is the special needs co-ordinator. We're not asking for any special exemption in this. We're just following what the Department of Education is saying right here.

Rob: Free Schools are 'free to' employ unqualified teachers. They are allowed to by law.

Cath: And he's doesn't want to be treated specially. That's what he means when he says we're not asking for any special exemption.

Rob: It's the Department of Education that says Free Schools can recruit unqualified teachers.

Cath: Well it's an interesting and very controversial idea. I suppose parents don't have to send their children to this school?

Rob: Yes that's true. But I'm afraid, Cath, you had no choice in trying to answer today's question!

Cath: OK.

Rob: I asked you According to Government figures, approximately how many school pupils are there in England?

6.1 million

7.1 million, or

8.1 million

Cath: I thought 7.1 million but I don't really know!

Rob: And you are absolutely wrong because the actual answer is 8.1 million pupils in England.

Cath: That's a lot. No wonder I can't get on the bus in the morning!

Rob: OK, well we're almost at the end of the programme, so Cath could you please remind us of some of the vocabulary we've heard in today's programme?

Cath: Of course! We had:

armed forces

reforms

qualified

certified

statistically

critics

undigested

ridiculous

approaches

exemption

Rob: Thanks Cath. See you next time!

Both: Bye!

本文来自公众微信号:外语教研

发新帖

最新评论

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条


关于我们|免责声明|广告合作|手机版|英语家园 ( 鄂ICP备2021006767号-1|鄂公网安备42010202000179号 )

GMT+8, 2026-8-17 16:03

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表